Review



surface surface colocalization  (Oxford Instruments)


Bioz Verified Symbol Oxford Instruments is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Oxford Instruments manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Oxford Instruments surface surface colocalization
    Surface Surface Colocalization, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 41025 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface colocalization/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 41025 article reviews
    surface surface colocalization - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface colocalization
    Surface Surface Colocalization, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface colocalization/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface colocalization - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface colocalization extension
    Surface Surface Colocalization Extension, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface colocalization extension/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface colocalization extension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface coloc xtension software
    Surface Surface Coloc Xtension Software, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface coloc xtension software/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface coloc xtension software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface colocalization imaris xtension
    µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), <t>Colocalization</t> of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).
    Surface Surface Colocalization Imaris Xtension, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface colocalization imaris xtension/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface colocalization imaris xtension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface colocalization extension
    µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), <t>Colocalization</t> of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).
    Surface Colocalization Extension, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface colocalization extension/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface colocalization extension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface coloc imaris matlab xtension
    µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), <t>Colocalization</t> of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).
    Surface Surface Coloc Imaris Matlab Xtension, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface coloc imaris matlab xtension/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface coloc imaris matlab xtension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments surface surface coloc function xtension
    µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), <t>Colocalization</t> of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).
    Surface Surface Coloc Function Xtension, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/surface surface coloc function xtension/product/Oxford Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    surface surface coloc function xtension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), Colocalization of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).

    Journal: Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)

    Article Title: Microgels With Electrostatically Controlled Molecular Affinity to Direct Morphogenesis

    doi: 10.1002/adma.202409731

    Figure Lengend Snippet: µGUIDEs as engineered signaling centers to locally stimulate kidney organoid vascularization. a,b), Colocalization of EC networks and emerging epithelial structures in human iPSC‐based kidney organoid cultures. a), Day 7 immunofluorescence staining showing PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left) and 500 µm (right). b), Day 17 Immunofluorescence staining highlighting WT1+ glomeruli, LTL+ proximal tubule cells, and CD31+ ECs. Scale bars: 1 mm (left), 500 µm (right). c), Schematic representation of the µGUIDE deposition within kidney organoids. d), 3D simulation of the kidney organoid transwell culture depicting the VEGF gradient formation from starPEG‐sGAG µGUIDEs using a reaction‐diffusion model. The simulations show the concentration profiles of freely diffusing VEGF (normalized by initial µGUIDE loading) between two adjacent µGUIDEs, 100 µm above the organoid base (dashed line in the schematic on the top left). The µGUIDE integral charge density (P1) is concluded to determine the duration of the VEGF gradient, from short‐term (hours) to long‐term (days). e), Phase contrast images of kidney organoids with P1 5 P2 3.6 µGUIDEs at day 0 (left; scale bar: 1 mm) and day 7 (right; scale bar: 200 µm). The arrowhead in the right image indicates a µGUIDE. f), Day 7 confocal images of kidney organoids cultured with VEGF‐loaded µGUIDEs (w/ VEGF), unloaded µGUIDEs (w/o VEGF) and no µGUIDEs (w/o µGUIDE). Scale bars, 1 mm. g), Quantitative analysis of the EC response (CD31 coverage area) to VEGF gradients around and between µGUIDEs at day 7. Control regions of interest (ROIs) of identical size were positioned in organoids without µGUIDEs. h,i), Analysis of the interactions between RVs and ECs. h), Confocal images of day 7 organoids stained for PAX2+ RVs and CD31+ ECs, with magenta indicating the contact area. Scale bar, 500 µm. i), Quantitative analysis of the RV‐EC contact. For all experiments, µGUIDEs with a diameter of ≈ 182 µm were used. Data are shown as mean ± s.d. ( n = 4).

    Article Snippet: Here, two surfaces were created for the respective source channels, and the surface‐surface colocalization Imaris XTension was applied.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Diffusion-based Assay, Concentration Assay, Cell Culture, Control